How Deep is Your Patriotism?

2009 November 27

How deep is your patriotism, gentle reader? Do you welcome yet another President who says, “once again, the American people are too stupid and uninformed about the deep intel that I alone have access to for them to form the right opinion about their own safety”? Yes, it is an attractive proposition: another someone-to-watch-over-me has arrived in the White House; let your neighbors send their sons and daughters to Afghanistan to kill, die and go mad — it’s all for the best in the best of all possible countries.

Now, another question: how about paying higher taxes for your safety? Ouch, that’s a different story, ain’t it? That’s build-the-barricades-in-the-street stuff, right?

Well, no, in fact: look at the story in that link again: Lincoln did it to pay for the war that wiped out virtually an entire generation of young men; FDR did it to fund WW2 and the nuclear dawn; and so on.

Shared sacrifice: that’s what war is all about (note: does not apply to Presidents and their families, members of Congress, executives of large corporations that profit from war). Everyone pays — with their life, their sanity, their health, or their money.

To me personally, it doesn’t mean a blessed thing: I’ve been out of work for 9 months and took the no-withholding option on my UI benefits. This means that, come April 15, I am officially ruined, and I mean turned utterly to financial dust. I will be looking at a sinkhole of a tax bill, and the Feds and state governments will take over my bank account and not let go of it until the debt is clear. They will, of course, only be taking their own money (with the 14 month extension, I’m eligible for benefits until June). I am on financial death row with about four and a half months till my execution date.

There are no doubt millions of Americans in exactly the same position as me: perhaps this is how the revolution will begin, with as many as ten million or more of us unable to pay our taxes and thrown into a cyber-debtor’s prison.

I will not be joining the barricades: I am too old, weak, and cowardly for that stuff. Revolt is not what I’m about; and anyway poverty fills me with neither rage nor fear, only mild annoyance. So all I can do now is observe the signs and show the President what’s ahead. How will these millions of unemployed react when they are told to forget about the rent, food, and caring for their kids — there’s turrurists to fight and kill and taxes must be paid to kill ‘em with.

Now, watch this weekend as the Geithner gang and its op-ed tank, the WSJ and other right wing outlets, assault Paul Krugman for his suggestion that taxing financial speculators might be a good idea. He will be branded a far-left, crazed, unpatriotic zealot with no concern for the future.

As we enter a new decade, it appears that change, once again, is entirely superficial: war is still the sport of the elite, a Roman game observed from on high by a gleaming Emperor; and Chicago is the new Crawford.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Fark
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb
2 Responses leave one →
  1. terry mckenna permalink
    November 28, 2009

    Theodore Roosevelt both fought in a war before his presidency – and when another war occurred, sent his sons off to fight in WW1 eagerly. one died. he certainly did suffer with the nation- though he was not a president at the time of the first WW, he was still politically active. he also was devastated when Kermit died. times have changed – though, to be frank, Obama’s kids are far to young to serve now. and the whole issue of the middle east is a mess that is hard to get out of no matter what. i favor stopping in place right now, but recognize that that would cause chaos. I suggest that Obama both recognizes that, and also recognizes that no good decision can be made.

  2. November 28, 2009

    Precisely, and in my own defense I’d say that in all my posts on Afghanistan there is no “peacenik-speak” — I don’t pretend that removing our military presence will create peace. It won’t — the warlords will remain, and the region will be just as 9th century as it was 9 years ago before we arrived with our drones and the rest of our remarkably inept military tech. I’ve been telling folks in corp-America for years that tech can’t solve all your problems, not even most of them. I have been, of course, ignored, and then hurled aside.

    Fact is, the only thoroughly effective military solution ever devised is The Bomb. It always works, but has some obviously deleterious side effects. This solution creates one kind of peace — the peace of death. The other kind of peace — the peace of Nature — is what eludes us in our own way (conflict is our daily bread in our media, our businesses, and our government) and folks like the Afghans in theirs (constant war, like a terminal but never-ceasing, ever-spreading cancer). My only message to Obama is: stop trying to put out international fires with gasoline. Create peace first at home, and then export it, not on a tank or an F-1, but in a fresh example of how government can be done in a new century.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS